Supreme Court Puts Early Voting Restrictions In Ohio Back In Effect

A day before early voting was to begin in Ohio, a 5-4 split court stops lower court rulings from going into effect that allowed for more extensive early voting in the Buckeye state.

WASHINGTON — A day before early voting was due to begin in Ohio, the Supreme Court, on a 5-4 vote, stopped it before it began.

Although early voting will still happen in Ohio, the state's NAACP had sued to stop a new state law and an associated order from Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted that restrict early voting in the state from going into effect.

The group won at the trial court and the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, but, on Monday afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay of this past week's order from the 6th Circuit — putting the new rules back into effect.

The court's more liberal members — Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan — would have denied the state's request for a stay.

Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted issued the following statement about the order:

"Today’s ruling validates what I have long said, elections in Ohio should be run by the same rules in every county and Ohioans should have the right to make those rules through their elected representatives.

"We are gratified the United States Supreme Court has allowed Ohio’s early voting law to stand.

"I plan to implement state law and the voting schedule established by Democrats and Republicans at the local level, meaning Ohioans will have 28 days of early voting, including two Saturdays and a Sunday.

"Ohioans can have confidence that it remains easy to vote and hard to cheat in our state."

Skip to footer